Skip to content
🎯

Ideal Weight Calculator

Find your ideal body weight based on height and gender using 4 medical formulas - Hamwi, Devine, Robinson, and Miller.

About the Ideal Weight Calculator

Ideal weight is not a single number but a range based on your height, gender, and body frame. Four medically-derived formulas - Hamwi, Devine, Robinson, and Miller - each give slightly different estimates, reflecting the inherent difficulty of defining a single ideal for a diverse population. These formulas were originally developed in clinical settings (particularly for drug dosing calculations where weight affects dosage) and have since been adapted for general health guidance. The Devine formula is most commonly cited in Indian clinical practice.

Combined with the healthy BMI weight range (18.5-22.9 for Indians), the four formulas together provide a realistic target zone rather than a single arbitrary point. Your current weight relative to this range tells you how much of a gap exists and what a realistic trajectory looks like. Importantly, ideal weight as defined by these formulas is a starting orientation - not a prescription. Body composition, muscle mass, and metabolic health markers are more informative targets than a scale number alone.

Ideal Weight Formulas (height in cm, H = cm above 152)

Hamwi: Men = 48 + 1.06×H, Women = 45.4 + 0.9×H · Devine: Men = 50 + 0.9×H, Women = 45.5 + 0.9×H

H = height above 152 cm in cm · Robinson: Men = 52 + 0.75×H, Women = 49 + 0.67×H · Miller: Men = 56.2 + 0.56×H, Women = 53.1 + 0.54×H · All formulas calibrated for heights above 152cm

Worked Example

Female, 163 cm (H = 11 cm above 152)

Height:163 cm
Gender:Female
H value:11 cm above 152

Hamwi: 55.3 kg · Devine: 55.4 kg · Robinson: 56.4 kg · Miller: 59.0 kg · Healthy BMI range (18.5-22.9): 49-61 kg

Tips & Insights

  • 1

    These formulas give the most reliable guidance for people of average muscle mass and typical body composition. Athletes, bodybuilders, and people with large bone frames can safely and healthily weigh 5-15% more than formula predictions suggest. For such individuals, body fat percentage is a more appropriate target metric than formula-based ideal weight.

  • 2

    For Indians, staying in the lower half of the healthy BMI range (18.5-20.9) is associated with lower metabolic disease risk compared to the upper normal range (21-22.9). Given that South Asians accumulate visceral fat at lower absolute weights, targeting the lower-mid portion of the healthy range is supported by Indian cardiovascular research.

  • 3

    Focus on body fat percentage and waist circumference alongside scale weight - these predict metabolic health risk better than weight alone. A person at their ideal weight with high waist circumference and low muscle mass has a worse metabolic profile than someone slightly above ideal weight with low waist and adequate muscle mass.

  • 4

    Losing just 5-10% of current body weight produces clinically significant improvements in blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol regardless of whether the person reaches ideal weight. The first 5-10% is the most metabolically impactful segment of any weight loss journey - achieving this target is worthwhile even if going further is not yet realistic.

  • 5

    Children and teenagers should use age-specific and sex-specific growth charts (WHO growth reference or IAP charts for India) rather than adult ideal weight formulas. The adult formulas are calibrated for fully developed adults and produce meaningless results for growing children and adolescents whose ideal proportions change year by year.

  • 6

    Note that all four formulas were developed and validated primarily on Western populations. For Indian adults, particularly those below 160 cm, the Devine formula may slightly overestimate ideal weight. Cross-checking against the healthy BMI weight range (calculated for your exact height using Indian cutoffs of 18.5-22.9) gives the most India-relevant orientation.

  • 7

    Pursue ideal weight through body recomposition rather than simple calorie restriction. Building muscle while losing fat produces the same scale weight reduction but with far better metabolic outcomes - higher resting metabolism, better insulin sensitivity, and superior physical function. Resistance training with adequate protein is the most effective mechanism for moving toward ideal weight sustainably.

Why this matters for you

The concept of ideal weight is useful as a motivational anchor and goal-setting tool, but the evidence consistently shows that metabolic fitness - cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, blood glucose regulation, and lipid profile - predicts longevity better than reaching any specific weight number. A person at 5 kg above their ideal weight who exercises regularly, eats adequate protein, and has normal blood markers is in better measurable health than a sedentary person at exactly their ideal weight.

That said, for the large majority of overweight Indians who are sedentary with elevated metabolic markers, moving toward the healthy weight range - even partially - produces meaningful, measurable health benefits. Research from AIIMS and PGI on Indian populations shows that a 5-10% reduction from an overweight baseline lowers fasting glucose by 8-15%, reduces systolic blood pressure by 5-10 mmHg, and improves insulin sensitivity within 3-6 months of sustained effort.

Use ideal weight as a direction, not a verdict. Rather than defining success only by whether you reach a specific number, track the concrete health markers that indicate metabolic improvement: waist circumference (below 90 cm for men and 80 cm for women), fasting blood sugar (below 100 mg/dL), and blood pressure (below 120/80). These indicators keep momentum going even when scale weight plateaus, which it invariably does during any sustainable weight loss journey, and they represent the actual health outcomes you are working toward.

Related Calculators

Frequently Asked Questions